Wasn't sure exactly which way you were arguing.

I would clarify:
The benefits [of changing the unorthodoxy noise definition would] outweight
this slight incompatibility.

Chris Huff wrote:

> This doesn't matter for the vast majority of scenes(only for those where
> a specific portion of the pattern was focused on), and I think the
> benefits outweigh this slight incompatibility. But I don't know how to
> fix it, I just know that there is a fix.
>
> --
> Chris Huff
> e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
> Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/

Post a reply to this message